| Home >Opinion |
Latest News
![]()
| advanced search >> |
- West caught in the Net of double standard
- Return to reason for real estate
- Time for financial sector reform
- East Asia Summit agenda
- Why not make food, health part of security
- China and India: Partners, not foes
- Curbing risks of big banks
- End begging for wages
- A good turn deserves another
- Accusations ignore the facts
1 of 0 Email
| Print
| Share
| Text Size | ![]() |
Imagine this: Eight National People's Congress lawmakers write to the Chinese government, requesting to block deals by a long list of United States companies, from Lockheed Martin and Boeing to Honeywell and General Electric.
The reason is simple yet compelling: National security. All these US companies have close ties with the US military. Allowing them to invest in China and supply equipment to sensitive Chinese industries will pose a serious threat to the country.
There is more. The EP3 spy plane built by Lockheed Martin was directly responsible for the collision with the Chinese fighter in the South China Sea in April 2001, resulting in the death of Chinese pilot Wang Hai.
Meanwhile, Northrop Grumman, a top US military industrial firm which is set to supply radio communication systems to the Chengdu area air traffic control center, should also be barred, because it manufactured the USS George Washington, the aircraft carrier which has been at the center of debate over recent joint military drills by the US and South Korea.
The request by the lawmakers could go on and on to trace every US company back to the days of the Korean War to find out whether their products have been used by the US army or any other armies against the Chinese.
By doing this, hundreds of US companies could be blacklisted for providing supplies such as planes and canned food to the US army during the Korean War, which claimed more than 200,000 Chinese soldiers.
If you think I am witch hunting, you are absolutely right.
However, eight US Congressmen wrote a letter to the Obama administration using exactly that kind of language in a bid to block Chinese telecom firm Huawei from supplying equipment to the wireless broadband network of Sprint Nextel, the third-largest mobile operator in the US.
The letter, dated Aug 18, charged Huawei of once selling communications technology to Saddam Hussein's regime and the Taliban before its fall. Huawei's fiber optic equipment in Saddam Hussein's air defense network had routinely been used to target US military aircraft.
Well, could we find out how many US companies sold deadly weapons to Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden when both of them were regarded as friends of the US?




Email
Print
Share
Text Size
