| Home >Opinion |
Latest News
![]()
| advanced search >> |
- Keep a red line for arable land
- Precision farming yields many gains
- Xi building bridges on global tour
- Language evolves on shifting sands
- New rules for global governance needed
- New direction for World Bank
- Further R&D reform needed
- Big boost for poverty-stricken province
- More sustainable growth
- Closer EU-China cooperation
1 of 0 Email
| Print
| Share
| Text Size | ![]() |
On Wednesday evening, I listened to talks by Chinese entrepreneurs on philanthropy and social responsibility at Columbia University, New York.
At least two of them, Niu Gensheng, founder of the dairy giant Mengniu Group, and Cao Dewang, founder of the Fuyao Group, are well-known in China as successful businessmen and philanthropists.
But as they expounded on their Buddhist understanding of philanthropy and their great works of charity, I couldn’t help thinking of a report released on Monday by the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.
The so-called blue paper of 2011 Corporate Social Responsibility graded 300 of the top companies based in China with an average score of only 19.7 out of a possible 100 on a corporate social responsibility index. The 300 firms include the top 100 from the State-owned, foreign-funded and private business sectors. Private businesses, unfortunately, were the only sector scoring lower than a year ago.
While the method being adopted may be debatable, the report shows that some 70 percent of businesses in China lack any sense of social responsibility whatsoever.
This is shocking.
It is no secret that many businesses in China have made a fortune in the past three decades by recklessly polluting the environment and illegal activities, one only has to look at the food and construction industries.
And polluting the environment is still a common practice. After the polluting of coastal regions in previous years, hinterland regions, which are desperate for investment, have become the new victims.
The question now is how much companies, whether State-owned, foreign-funded or privately run, should be made liable for the pollution and corruption they produce.
Many businessmen who took advantage of the country’s lax environmental regulations have started to move abroad with their families to escape the environmental degradation they have helped cause, while most of the 1.3 billion Chinese population have to bear the consequences of their actions.




Email
Print
Share
Text Size
